Legal Opinion

Barber v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1991No. 8910IC588PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

We note at the outset that plaintiff filed this action for workers’ compensation benefits alleging that he had contracted the occupa tional disease of asbestosis in his job as an insulation worker. After a hearing, a Deputy Commissioner of the Industrial Commission found that plaintiff does, in fact, suffer from asbestosis, but that the defendant-employer is not liable for payment of workers’ compensation under the purview of G.S. § 97-53(24) since plaintiff was not exposed to the hazards of asbestos for as much as thirty working days or parts therof during the course of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Haynes v. . Feldspar Producing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Fetner v. Rocky Mount Marble & Granite WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Caulder v. Waverly MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Barber v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. In re S.D.J.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Crawford v. FayezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. TappeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Hatcher v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Albritton v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API