Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. J.P. Stevens & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1993No. 16PA91PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This is a claim for workers’ compensation benefits based on plaintiff’s contention that he has been rendered totally disabled by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) caused by his long exposure to cotton dust while working for defendant Burlington Industries (Burlington). 1 The evidence before the Industrial Commission (Commission) tended to show that plaintiff’s exposure to cotton dust played no causal role in the development of, but probably aggravated, his COPD. The Commission denied plaintiff’s claim on the ground that his COPD was not an occupational disease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Caulder v. Waverly MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hassell v. Onslow County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Childress v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Barrier v. Rospatch labels/paxar Corp.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996
  4. Blackwell v. Sara Lee Knit ProductsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996
  5. Burns v. Clevemont mills/fruit of the LoomNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API