Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1983No. 415PA82PublishedCited by 416 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*87EXUM, Justice.

The questions for decision are whether the Industrial Commission applied the wrong legal standard in its order denying benefits to claimant and whether there is evidence from which the Commission could have made findings, using the correct legal standard, that would support a conclusion that claimant contracted an occupational disease. We answer both questions affirmatively.

After hearing evidence for claimant and defendants, Deputy Commissioner Denson concluded that claimant had not contracted an occupational disease. This conclusion was based in part on the following factual…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Haynes v. . Feldspar Producing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by416 opinions

  1. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Barber v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Harvey v. Raleigh Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Hardin v. Motor Panels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

411 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API