Legal Opinion

Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of Transportation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 8, 1981No. 120PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

I

After finding numerous facts, Judge Long made three conclusions of law: First, the Department has the authority, pursuant to G.S. § 136-89.55, to construct such service roads as in its opinion are necessary or desirable; second, the right-of-way which the Department seeks to acquire from plaintiffs is for a public road; and, third, the Department’s exercise of its powers of condemnation in this case is for a public purpose. Each of these conclusions is pertinent to a proper resolution of the case sub judice. However, two preliminary considerations must be addressed first if…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mozingo v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Caulder v. Waverly MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Farley v. HollerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Nelson v. Town of HighlandsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. NEW HANOVER COUNTY DIST. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API