Legal Opinion

State v. Koberlein

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1983No. 103PA83PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The basic question for review by this Court is whether the defendant was brought to trial within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act, G.S. 15A-701 et seq. We answer this question in the affirmative, reverse the opinion of the Court of Appeals which held to the contrary and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for its consideration of the merits of the remaining issues raised by the defendant in his appeal to that Court.

The issue which this Court finds dispositive makes a recitation of the evidence presented at trial unnecessary. Warrants were issued for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. BoltinhouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Empire Power Co. v. N. C. Department of EnvironmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Caulder v. Waverly MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. RainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HearstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API