Gay v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendants contend the Commission erred in concluding that plaintiff suffers from an occupational disease compensable under N.C. Gen. Stat. 97-53(13). Alternatively, they contend that plaintiff was not injuriously exposed while in defendant-employer’s employment and that the Commission erred in failing so to determine. We find sufficient evidence from which the Commission could conclude that plaintiff suffers from an occupational disease. We also find sufficient evidence from which the Commission could have concluded that plaintiff was last injuriously exposed to the causes of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Walston v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Clark v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Austin v. Continental General TireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Abernathy v. Sandoz Chemicals/Clariant Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Norris v. Drexel Heritage Furnishings, Inc./MascoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Keel v. H & v. INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.