Huerstal v. Muir
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the county of Contra Costa, made after final judgment in an action of ejectment, directing the issuing of an alias writ of possession and directing the sheriff to remove the appellants from the premises and deliver possession to the plaintiff. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
This is an appeal from an order subsequent to judgment.
The record of the case shows that Hugh Muir had been dispossessed of a parcel of land in Contra Costa County, by a writ of restitution issued upon a judgment of the late district court of that county, rendered in favor of L. Huerstal against the said Hugh Muir and one William Harding, for recovery of possession of said land and costs of suit. After Muir had been dispossessed by the writ he re-entered upon the land; and in proceedings against him for the re-entry he was adjudged guilty of contempt of court, and punished, and an alias writ…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Long v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Gray v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Long v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Saunders v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arrieta v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Rector v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Harrod v. BurkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- List v. SandellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Penryn Fruit Co. v. Sherman-Worrell Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.