Legal Opinion

Arrieta v. Mahon

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1982No. L.A. 31447PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

I

At issue in this case is the former policy of the Los Angeles County Marshal, when enforcing a writ of execution after an unlawful detainer judgment, to evict all occupants of the premises, whether or not they were named in the writ. The trial court ruled that without a further or der of the court, the eviction of any adults not named in the writ who claim a right to possession of the disputed premises that arose before the unlawful detainer action was commenced, violated the rights of such individuals to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Langford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lynn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Bedi v. McMullanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. George v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Fiske v. GillespieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API