Legal Opinion

Rector v. Lewis

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1920No. Civ. No. 3165PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The parties to this action had entered -into a contract for the exchange of lands. Plaintiff brought' suit to enforce the execution of a deed to the premises which defendants had contracted to convey, and of which plaintiff was in possession. Defendants answered and filed their cross-complaint for a rescission of the contract and for recovery of possession of the land and certain -personal property that went with it, as covered by the contract, to gether with damages for waste, the value of crops raised and harvested by plaintiff, and the rental value of the land.

The trial court, by an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Stockwell v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Churchill v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Johnston v. FishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Joe E. Haldeman and Kathryn O. Haldeman Ross Haldeman and Janet Haldeman, Debtors-In Possession v. State of Wyoming Farm Loan BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Shamlian v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Edwards v. Lee's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API