Gray v. Nunan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
Objection is made to the consideration of the statement on motion for a new trial, because, as is said, no notice of intention to move for a new trial Avas filed or served. We find in the transcript a stipulation on the part of defendant, giAnng the plaintiff further time within which to serve his statement on motion for new trial; and AArhen the statement was seiwcd on defendant’s attorney, the latter in acknowledging its receipt, reserved the right to object that the statement was not seiwcd in time, but at no time in the .court below objected to the settlement or consideration of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Saunders v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hamilton v. DoolyUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Huerstal v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Brichman v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Simpson v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.