Penryn Fruit Co. v. Sherman-Worrell Fruit Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. J. W. Hughes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
The Sherman-Worrell Fruit Company (hereafter called the Sherman Company) did not appear in the action. Defendant Farmers’ and Mechanics’ Savings Bank (hereafter called the bank) demurred to the complaint; the demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff declining to amend, defendant the bank had judgment dismissing the action from which this appeal is taken.
It appears from the complaint that on December 8, 1897, R. B. and Dan T. Sherman, predecessors in interest of the Sherman Company, were owners of certain land planted to fruit-trees in Placer County; on that day they executed to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Huerstal v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Dascey v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Summerlin v. Orange Shores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n v. Hirsch Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- List v. SandellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Pollack v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.