Long v. Neville
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Seventh. Judicial District, Solano County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court, and in 29 Cal. 131, where the case is reported on a former appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, C. J. :
Martin A. and J. T. Hull, being in possession of the premises in question, one B. B. Ellis commenced a -suit against them in the County Court of Solano County to recover the possession, alleging in his complaint that the said Hulls entered under a lease from said Ellis, dated November 2d, 1860, for a term ending November 1st, 1861; that the term *457had expired, that possession had been demanded in writing and refused, and that said defendants wrongfully withheld possession. After a trial by jury and verdict for plaintiff, judgment was rendered for restitution of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. ChilesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
- Chamberlain v. . BellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Long v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Curtis v. PattersonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grace v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Huerstal v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Arena v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Harrington's Administrator v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.