Harrod v. Burke
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Cowley district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
This was an action of replevin for wheat in the shock. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff brings the case here.. Error is predicated upon this instruction.
The wheat was upon lands for the possession of which the plaintiff’s wards recovered a judgment, which was affirmed in this court. (Beiswanger v. Bangs, 72 Kan. 702, 83 Pac. 1032.) The defendant entered into-possession of the land after the action of ejectment, had been commenced, under a contract to purchase' from one H. T. Trice, wlm was not a party, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Head v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Huerstal v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Smith v. KimballSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Chapman v. VeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Merrill v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Houston Oil Co. of Tex. v. v. M. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934
- Four-S Razor Co. v. GuymonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Coffin v. Old Line Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Kehlier v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- McGraw v. Premium Finance Co. of MissouriCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.