Legal Opinion
In Re Richardson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1992No. 90-1539PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter comes to us from the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) as a reciprocal discipline case that arose because the Supreme Court of Florida disciplined respondent for charging clearly excessive attorney’s fees. The Florida court suspended respondent for ninety-one days, required proof of fitness for reinstatement, imposed a two-year probation period after reinstatement, and required the payment of $15,470 in restitution and $5,144.81 in costs for the disciplinary process. 1 The Board in its report concluded that a de novo hearing was not required and that reciprocal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ali Baba Co., Inc. v. Wilco, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re WallerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re TraversDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re BridgesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.