Legal Opinion
In Re Reid
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1988No. 87-281PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent, Arthur J. Reid, Jr., engaged in certain misconduct in Maryland involving misappropriation and conversion of client funds. The Court of Appeals of Maryland noted that ordinarily respondent’s misconduct would warrant the sanction of disbarment, but that his alcoholism was a factor in mitigation. 1 The Maryland court therefore ordered respondent indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, but entered its order without prejudice to his right to apply for reinstatement after the expiration of a period of thirty days. On May 5,1987, after serving a sixty-three day suspension,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.