Legal Opinion
In Re Waller
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1987No. 86-774PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
In its Report and Recommendation dated May 12, 1986, the Board on Professional Responsibility (hereinafter “the Board”) found that John Waller had violated three disciplinary rules of the Code on Professional Responsibility: DR2-110(B)(4) (failing to withdraw from employment after being discharged), DR2-106(A) (charging a clearly excessive fee), and DR9103(B)(4) (failing to deliver to a client papers which the client was entitled to receive). The Board recommended a sanction of 30 days’ suspension. Waller challenges the Board’s decision as to each of these violations,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- McGowan v. ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Newcomb v. SchaefflerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Milton Kelner, PA v. 610 Lincoln Road, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Robinson v. NussbaumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.