Legal Opinion

Ali Baba Co., Inc. v. Wilco, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1984No. 83-793PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in ruling that appellees were not collaterally estopped from raising the same defenses in this suit to collect a deficiency on a note as they had raised in a prior landlord and tenant action for possession in which summary judgment was granted against appellees after they had interposed a plea of title. We agree that appellant can properly assert a claim of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment for appellees and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to enter a judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. HolleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Bernstein v. FernandezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API