Legal Opinion
In Re Richardson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1997No. 95-BG-639PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Respondent T. Carlton Richardson, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, takes exception to the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility. The Board asks us to suspend Richardson from practice in the District of Columbia for three years as reciprocal discipline for conduct that caused Richardson to resign voluntarily from the Florida Bar in 1992. Richardson argues that his Florida resignation was not “discipline” and, therefore, that the imposition of reciprocal discipline, including his interim suspension without an evidentiary hearing,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re DayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re FuchsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re Estate of RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.