Legal Opinion
In Re Travers
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 2000No. 97-BG-114PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) found that respondent Matthew J. Travers, a member of our bar, accepted an illegal fee and engaged in conduct that seriously interfered with the administration of justice. Given these findings, the Board has recommended that Mr. Travers be suspended for ninety days and that his reinstatement be conditioned on satisfaction of a $3,652.74 judgment against him. Mr. Travers contends that the record does not support a finding that he committed misconduct and that the recommended sanction is not warranted. Bar Counsel…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re CarlsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.