Legal Opinion

Alexander v. De Witt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1944No. 10514PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment which granted a motion to dismiss, and dismissed, as to appellees, an action by appellant, Kenneth Alexander, hereafter called plaintiff, against appellees and other defendants. Appellees are John L. De Witt and R. B. Hood. Their codefendants were L. F. Sloan, L. G. White, Randell Larson, Hugh T. Fullerton and three whom plaintiff, not knowing their true names, called Doe One, Doe Two and Doe Three. Appellees’ co-defendants were never served with process and never appeared. The ground of the motion to dismiss was that, as to appellees, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re: Robert Grier v. Finjan Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Ochikubo v. BonesteelDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
  3. Denicke v. BrighamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Ochikubo v. BonesteelDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  5. Labedz v. KramerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API