Jones v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. This cause was argued with No. 1142, Smith v. United States, and No. 1144, Key v. United States, post, 224. On the application of the counsel for' the several plaintiffs in error it was ordered, that three counsel for plaintiffs in error be allowed to make oral argument herein. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
This was an indictment, found in the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, and remitted to the ’Circuit Court under Rev. Stat. § 1039, alleging that Henry Jones, late of that district, on September 14, 1889, “at Navassa Island, a place which then and there was under the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State or district of the United States, the same being,'at the time of the committing of the offences in the manner and form as hereinafter stated by the persons hereinafter named, an island situated…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by266 opinions
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.