Legal Opinion
Denicke v. Brigham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1944No. 10347PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California1 dismissing for want of jurisdiction an action by appellant, Ernest H. Denicke, against appellees, R'. D. Brigham, Samuel Kahn, William B. Reis, Leon Sloss, Jr., Herbert Fleishhacker, Mortimer Fleishhacker, Mortimer Fleishhacker, Jr., Walter E. Buck, R. Stanley Dollar, Walter A. Haas, William F. Humphrey, J. C. McKinstry, Alfred B. Swinerton, Joseph O. Tobin and Joseph Haber, Jr., for damages in the sum of $86,562,2 with interest and costs.
The District…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Fox v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Talton v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bachman v. First-Mechanics Nat. Bank of TrentonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
- Doble v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944