Legal Opinion

Ochikubo v. Bonesteel

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 1, 1945No. 3834-PH, 3854-PHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs seek to invalidate and enjoin the enforcement of individual exclusion orders issued by the Commanding General of the Western Defense Command under the authority of Executive Order 9066 of February 19, 1942 (7 F.R. 2320). Appendix I. 1

Any consideration of Executive Order 9066 must also involve Public Law 503, of March 21, 1942, 56 Stat. 173, 18 U.S.C.A. § 97a. Appendix II.

While the history of Executive Order 9066 and Public Law 503 has been reviewed by the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court in several cases 2 wherein different phases than here…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Marine Corp. v. The Towboat Z-FourteenDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  2. Barn Ballroom Co. v. AinsworthDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1946
  3. Wilcox v. EmmonsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API