Legal Opinion

Ochikubo v. Bonesteel

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 2, 1944No. Civil Action No. 3834-PHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

I have listened with a great deal of interest to Mr. Wirin’s argument, and to Mr. Carr’s reply. At the inception of the argument Mr. Wirin expressed the thought which was in my mind, that is, concerning the hurdles that plaintiff would have to get over because the equity power of injunction is a great power; it is an unusual one, and is only used in exceptional cases. In other words, the general theory is that the status quo should be perserved.

The plaintiff at this time seeks to have the Court draw a conclusion, as a fact, that the defendants intend and expect to use…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Alexander v. De WittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ochikubo v. BonesteelDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945
  2. Barn Ballroom Co. v. AinsworthDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API