Legal Opinion

Labedz v. Kramer

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 18, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

(Oral opinion from the bench January 7, 1944, and January 18, 1944.)

What you ask for and what is asked for in all of these cases is that the enforcement of a criminal law shall be restrained.

The only coercive thing behind these exclusion orders is the threat of criminal prosecution.1 Of course we all know that this legislation and these orders were thought out by somebody, and properly so, in advance of the military crisis that now confronts the country. Somebody between the last war and this war conceived the framework that would be set up of executive action, or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Alexander v. De WittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowles v. RichardsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API