Legal Opinion
Petraborg v. Zontelli
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1944No. 33,727PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
This action was brought to restrain defendants from constructing a dam and draining the eastern section of Rabbit Lake in connection with certain contemplated mining operations thereon. The court permanently enjoined such activity. Defendant Youngstown Mines Corporation appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The trial court issued a temporary restraining order and an order to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue. At the hearing on the order to show cause, affidavits were submitted and some oral testimony received. To secure a prompt…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Whittaker v. StangvickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. BrunswickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Johnson v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. Longyear Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.