Legal Opinion

State v. Korrer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1914No. Nos. 18,551-(4)PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county against Eliza Korrer, Edmund N. Korrer, Annie L. Korrer, John Brennan, White-Iron Lake Iron Oo., Albert B. Coates, Martha R. Coates, and Euclid Iron Mining Co. to enjoin defendants from interfering with the public waters of Longyear lake, from removing the iron ore under said lake and the natural waters thereof, from removing the iron ore from under that part of the bed of said lake which would be covered by the waters…

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for St. Louis county against Eliza Korrer, Edmund N. Korrer, Annie L. Korrer, John Brennan, White-Iron Lake Iron Oo., Albert B. Coates, Martha R. Coates, and Euclid Iron Mining Co. to enjoin defendants from interfering with the public waters of Longyear lake, from removing the iron ore under said lake and the natural waters thereof, from removing the iron ore from under that part of the bed of said lake which would be covered by the waters thereof in the natural condition of said lake at the time of the commencement of the action but for the erection by defendants…

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

The bed of Longyear lake contains deposits of iron ore both between high and low-water mark and below low-water mark. Defendants own land-abutting on the lake. Upon their taking steps to remove the ore beneath the bed of the lake, and for that purpose to fill in the lake bed from the shore to a point some distance below low-water mark, the state brought this action to restrain them. Both the state and the defendants claim a proprietary interest in the ore underlying the bed of the lake. The real issue involved is whether the state has such interest in this body of water and the bed thereof…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Martin v. BuschSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Stewart v. . TurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API