Legal Opinion

Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1963No. 38,615PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

On February 20, 1958, The Youngstown Mining Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Youngstown), pursuant to Minn. St. 6.136, submitted to the commissioner of conservation a verified claim for re fund of royalties it had paid the state under a mineral lease covering a portion of the bed of Rabbit Lake. The claim for refund was based on a provision of the lease respecting the ownership of the ores mined under it; the findings, conclusions, and judgment stipulated for in an action by the state to reform the lease; and a judgment, entered in a subsequent action, which determined…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Hauschildt v. BeckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Perkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Susla v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API