Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Seifert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1960No. 37,692PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment determining rights of riparian owners to use of waters of intertract lakes.

The principal question raised by this appeal is whether the owner of a tract abutting on a lake, suitable for fishing, boating, hunting, swimming, and other domestic or recreational uses to which our lakes are ordinarily put in common with other abutting owners, has a right to make use of the lake over its entire surface, irrespective of whether the lake is navigable and irrespective of the ownership of the lakebed.

This was an action by plaintiff — appellant—to enjoin defendants…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Sterling v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Collins v. GerhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Duval v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Anderson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. J.J.N.P. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Parks v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Beacham v. Lake Zurich Property Owners Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API