Legal Opinion
State v. Longyear Holding Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 8, 1947No. 34,336PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action by the state to determine adverse claims to the bed of Syracuse Lake, situated in sections 5 and 6, township 58 north, range 15 west, St. Louis county, Minnesota. The action involves only that portion of the bed of the lake below low-water mark, comprising approximately 38 acres, in which there are valuable iron ore deposits.
Defendants other than Lake Mining Company, which is operating under lease from the state, are the owners of all interests in the land bordering on said lake. For brevity, they are hereinafter referred to as the riparian owners.
Some 20…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State Land Board v. SAUSEOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.