Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. Brunswick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The respondents, Margaret Brunswick and others, appealed to the district court for Washington county from an award made in condemnation proceedings instituted by the appellant company. The appeal was tried before McGluer, J., and a jury, and respondents had a verdict. This appeal is taken from an order refusing a new trial. cited Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
1. The appellant was organized to build and operate a railway from the north line of the city of Stillwater to the south line of the town of Baytown, in Washington county, the principal object of which was to connect by railway the different railroads now terminating in the city of Stillwater, viz., those whose depot is in the lower or southern, and those whose depot is in the upper or northern, end of the city, appellant’s road being designed as a transfer road between them. The appellant had instituted proceedings to condemn, for the purposes of their road, the property of respondents. Upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Mumford v. WardwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.