Legal Opinion
King v. Finnell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 1979No. 50638PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:. This case involves an action on a promissory note brought by Appellee, Ramon L. King, who alleged that he was the assignee of a note given to the City Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma, by Ms. Dixie Neely, doing business as Dixie’s Bar-B-Q.
At the time Ms. Neely executed the note, the Bank, requiring additional security, obtained a separate written guarantee agreement from Mr. King. As time progressed, and Ms. Neely began to experience difficulty in making timely payments on the note, she arranged to have her former husband, Richard Lee Finnell, lend his name to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bobo v. BigbeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Noble v. Beeman-Spaulding-Woodward Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Jorski Mill & Elevator Co., Inc., and Millers Mutual Insurance Association of Illinois v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Van Antwerp v. SchultzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Yaffe v. Bank of ChelseaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
3Cited by20 opinions
- LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Smedsrud v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- City of Lawton v. International Union of Police Associations, Local 24Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Krumme v. MoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- ABB Vecto Gray, Inc. v. First National Bank of Bethany (In re Robinson Bros. Drilling, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.