Legal Opinion

Van Antwerp v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1950No. 33293PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrelll, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs Bertha Schultz and R. C. Schultz against the defendants Atlas Investment Company, L. N. Van Antwerp, and Joseph E. Washington, to enforce collection of a promissory note. At the time the case was tried Atlas Investment Company had been liquidated and dissolved. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs against both defendants, and rendered judgment over in favor of defendant Washington and against defendant Van Antwerp in case defendant Washington should be compelled to pay all or any part of the judgment. Defendant Van Antwerp appeals.

F…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Skinner Et Ux. v. Scott Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Baker v. DeichmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Linton v. Chestnutt-Gibbons Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Larrance Tank Corporation v. BurroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Frank v. NATIONAL PRINTING AND OFFICE SUPPLY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Burtrum v. GomesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API