Legal Opinion

Smedsrud v. Powell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 2002No. 97,046PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the Court of Civil Appeals [COCA] erred in affirming summary judgment for the defendant? We answer in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

¶ 2 Edward Smedsrud [Smedsrud] brought an action to recover for injuries he sustained upon the premises of Cecil Powell d/b/a/ Pappy’s Corner [Owner]. This is Smedsrud’s certiorari quest upon his second appeal for review of the trial court’s second summary judgment and of its postjudgment decision on a new-trial motion. COCA affirmed the trial court’s second summary disposition for Owner.

The First…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Fox v. MizeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  3. Martinez v. Angel Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API