Smedsrud v. Powell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the Court of Civil Appeals [COCA] erred in affirming summary judgment for the defendant? We answer in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
¶ 2 Edward Smedsrud [Smedsrud] brought an action to recover for injuries he sustained upon the premises of Cecil Powell d/b/a/ Pappy’s Corner [Owner]. This is Smedsrud’s certiorari quest upon his second appeal for review of the trial court’s second summary judgment and of its postjudgment decision on a new-trial motion. COCA affirmed the trial court’s second summary disposition for Owner.
The First…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Fox v. MizeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Martinez v. Angel Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.