Legal Opinion
City of Lawton v. International Union of Police Associations, Local 24
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 8, 2002No. 95,122PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
T1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the Court of Civil Appeals erred in not dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction? We answer in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
T2 The City of Lawton [City] terminated the employment of Damion Hart [Hart], a police officer. He challenged the discharge by filing a grievance with the City. Upon its denial he demanded grievance arbitration asserted as authorized by a collective bargaining agreement 1 between the City and the International Union of Police Associations, Local 24 [IUPA] (Hart's bargaining agent). Hart obtained an…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Di Giovanni v. Camden Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.