Legal Opinion

Krumme v. Moody

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1995No. 75806PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Justice.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals, Oklahoma City Division III, to review an unpublished order of the Court of Appeals. The issue addressed in the present matter is whether a co-maker to a note is entitled to raise surety or accommodation maker status in an attempt to claim defenses available only to persons with the status of surety or accommodation maker.

SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In order to finance the purchase of a bank, the parties to this suit, as co-makers, executed two promissory notes with an aggregate face value of $8,170,000.00. For his share of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Pine Island RV Resort, Inc. v. Resort Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  4. SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
  5. Crown Life Insurance Co. v. Haag Ltd. PartnershipColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API