Legal Opinion

Strong v. Hall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

(Pro Tempore).

This is a suit by the purchasers to require the seller to.specifically perform a real estate contract involving property in Vernonia. From a decree: of-the trial court *63declaring the existence of a contract between the parties and requiring the defendant seller to specifically perform the same the defendant appeals.

The parties became acquainted while living on properties that abutted on the rear of each. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, had several children and desired more living space than their then home afforded. The residence owned and occupied by the defendant, an elderly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Tigglebeck v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Reed v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Consolidation Services, Inc. v. Keybank National Association and KeycorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Parthenon Construction & Design, Inc. v. NeumanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Kazlauskas v. KBBP, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Martin v. AllbrittonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Mukai Living Trust v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API