Legal Opinion

Martin v. Allbritton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 1993No. 90-CV-0458-TM; CA A75616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment that denied his counterclaims for quiet title and specific performance and held in favor of plaintiff on his claim of forcible entry and detainer. 1 On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse.

We make these findings. After separating from his wife in 1986, defendant rented a house for $400 per month from Vesta Kinney. In October, 1988, defendant entered into a written agreement with Kinney in which Kinney granted to defendant the option to buy the rented property for $39,900. The option required that it be exercised before May 15, 1990. Under the terms of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huffstutter v. LindOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. LUCKEY ET UX v. DeatsmanOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rise v. SteckelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Baxter v. Redevco, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Share v. WILLIAMS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burgdorf v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Welsh v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. DeCair v. DeCairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Donahue v. NagelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Oltmanns v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API