Legal Opinion

Tigglebeck v. Russell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1949PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

This is a suit for relief in the nature of specific enforcement of an oral contract to devise and bequeath property in consideration of the performance of personal services by the promisee for the promisor. It seeks to have certain real and personal properties and moneys, comprising the estate of Imogen Elinore Bus- sell, deceased, impressed with a trust in the hands of the defendants in favor of plaintiff, Marie Tiggelbeek. The defendant Erma D. Bussell is the administratrix of the estate of said decedent, and the other defendants are decedent’s heirs at law.

For brevity, we adopt the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Hunter v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brown v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Woods v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In re Burke's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Le Vee v. Le VeeOregon Supreme Court · 1919

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Williams v. OrmsbyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Torrance v. Aames Funding Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  3. Meads v. StottOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Strong v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Clark v. PORTLAND TRUST BANKOregon Supreme Court · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API