Legal Opinion

Mukai Living Trust v. Lopez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 27, 2005No. CCV0212141; A122795PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff, a trust that owns a house in Lake Oswego, brought an action to eject defendant, the house’s occupant, and for back rent. Defendant answered that, under the terms of an oral agreement with the owner’s predecessors, he was entitled to occupy the house during his lifetime. He also counterclaimed in quantum meruit to recover the cost of improvements. The court granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the ejectment claim and entered an ORCP 67 B judgment to that effect. Defendant appeals, and we affirm.

Because plaintiff prevailed on summary judgment, we review the record in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Le Vee v. Le VeeOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. LUCKEY ET UX v. DeatsmanOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Strong v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Eugene Pioneer Cemetery Ass'n v. Spencer Butte Lodge No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burgdorf v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State Of Washington v. Kenneth A. WardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Rafferty & Towner, Inc. v. NJS ENTERPRISES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State Of Washington v. Twinn CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API