Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Tobin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1929PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to compel specific performance of a covenant to renew a lease. On July 11, 1923, J. J. Tobin and Ms wife leased the Electric hotel and annex, located in Oregon City, to plaintiff Deo Edwards and his cotenant Elmer West, for a period of five years at a rental of $175 per month. The renewal clause out of which this controversy grows, provides:

“It is further mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto that the lessees shall have an option to renew this lease at the expiration thereof, for a period of five years, subject to the conditions herein on the same terms as expressed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Hall v. WeatherfordArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Slade v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Young v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Arnot v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Kaybill Corp., Inc. v. CherneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Walker v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  5. George Y. Worthington & Son Management Corp. v. LevyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API