Legal Opinion

Parthenon Construction & Design, Inc. v. Neuman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 15, 2000No. 97-1276-E-3; CA A103698PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*174HASELTON, J.

Plaintiff Parthenon Construction & Design, Inc., appeals. Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s allowance of summary judgment against plaintiffs claims seeking (1) payment or lien foreclosure for construction-related services; and (2) specific performance of an oral agreement to convey an interest in real property.1 In particular, plaintiff contends that the court erred in determining that, under ORS 701.065 (1995), plaintiffs failure to remain “continuously registered” with the Construction Contractors Board (CCB) barred plaintiffs claims for breach of contract or lien…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. LUCKEY ET UX v. DeatsmanOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Strong v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Malzer v. SchislerOregon Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Villanueva v. Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. PREHALL v. WeigelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. G. I. Joe's, Inc. v. NizamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Splinters, Inc. v. Andersen/WeitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Donahue v. NagelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API