State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant pleaded no contest to first-degree theft. ORS 164.055. The trial court imposed a dispositional departure sentence after finding that the victim was particularly vulnerable and that defendant was not amenable to probation. On appeal, defendant argues that the sentence is unlawful under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US_, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), because he did not admit the aggravating factors on which the trial court based the departure sentence and the state neither pleaded them in the indictment nor proved them to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We remand for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GornickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. OatneyOregon Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Markwood v. RenardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. HochhalterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. HochhalterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.