Legal Opinion

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991No. CC A8704 02489; CA A60011; SC S37666PublishedCited by 894 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeals erred when it decided this case on an issue that was neither preserved in the trial court nor raised in appellant’s opening brief on appeal. We hold that it did err and, accordingly, reverse.

Plaintiff, a professional jockey, was injured while riding at defendant’s racetrack. His complaint alleged that his injuries were caused by defendant’s negligence.

Before trial, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the statute of limitations, ORS 12.110(1), barred the claim. The motion was denied.

At trial, defendant moved for a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by894 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007

889 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API