Legal Opinion

State v. Jessup

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 2005No. 0301-30518; A123246PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of two counts of first-degree criminal mistreatment, ORS 163.205, and two counts of felony fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160. The trial court imposed departure sentences on each of the convictions based on a variety of departure factors, including that defendant knew or had reason to know of the victim’s particular vulnerability, OAR 213-008-0002(1)(b)(B). Defendant argues that, under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), the court erred in imposing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API