Legal Opinion

State v. Oatney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2003No. C973456CR; SC S45850PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*278BALMER, J.

This case is before us on automatic and direct review of defendant’s convictions for eight counts of aggravated murder and sentence of death. Defendant challenges trial court rulings in the pretrial, guilt, and penalty phases of his trial, seeking reversal of his convictions or, in the alternative, vacation of his sentence of death and remand for resentencing. For the reasons set out below, we affirm the convictions for aggravated murder and the sentence of death.

I. FACTS

Because the jury found defendant guilty, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the state. State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. TerryOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. BarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. McKaney v. ForemanArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API