State v. Sullivan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Defendant, who was convicted of several crimes after he entered sax Alford plea, 1 appeals pursuant to ORS 138.050, asserting that his sentences exceed the maximum allowable by law. In particular, defendant asserts that (1) under the reasoning of Blakely v. Washington, 542 US _, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), the trial court’s imposition of an upward departure sentence on defendant’s conviction for delivery of a controlled substance to a minor, ORS 475.995, was unconstitutional; and (2) the trial court erred in imposing a 60-month probationary sentence on defendant’s conviction for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Ignacio GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006