Legal Opinion
State v. Hochhalter
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 2, 2006No. 32117-3-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
128 P.3d 104 (2006)
STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
Daniel John HOCHHALTER, Appellant.
No. 32117-3-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
February 2, 2006.
James David Senescu, Clark County Prosecutors Office, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.
Lisa Elizabeth Tabbut, Attorney at Law, Longview, WA, for Appellant.
MORGAN, J.P.T.[1]
¶ 1 Daniel John Hochhalter appeals convictions for felonious violation of a domestic violence order (Count I), second degree assault (Count II), and second degree unlawful possession of a firearm (Count III). He alleges that the evidence is insufficient to support…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012