State v. Hochhalter
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Morgan, J.*
— Daniel John Hochhalter appeals convictions for felonious violation of a domestic violence order (count I), second degree assault (count II), and second degree unlawful possession of a firearm (count III). He alleges that the evidence is insufficient to support count I, that the “to-convict” instruction on count III erroneously omitted an element of the crime, and that he was denied his right to have a jury find each fact needed to support his sentence. We reverse the conviction on count I and vacate the sentences on counts II and III.
¶2 In early 2004, Hochhalter was D.D.’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012