Legal Opinion

State v. Hochhalter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 2, 2006No. 32117-3-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Morgan, J.*

— Daniel John Hochhalter appeals convictions for felonious violation of a domestic violence order (count I), second degree assault (count II), and second degree unlawful possession of a firearm (count III). He alleges that the evidence is insufficient to support count I, that the “to-convict” instruction on count III erroneously omitted an element of the crime, and that he was denied his right to have a jury find each fact needed to support his sentence. We reverse the conviction on count I and vacate the sentences on counts II and III.

¶2 In early 2004, Hochhalter was D.D.’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. State v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API