Norwood v. Washington County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
This case presents another question about the meaning of Measure 49, the referendum that replaced Measure 37 and altered its remedies for a reduction in property value caused by a land use regulation. In particular, Measure 49 changed the legal effect of any state or local government waiver of restrictive land use regulations that had been obtained as a Measure 37 remedy (“Measure 37 waiver”). Plaintiffs obtained a Measure 37 waiver from the county in order to allow residential development of their property. Following the adoption of Measure 49, the county denied plaintiffs’ subdivision…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Cyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Las Vegas Development Group, LLC v. YfantisDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Curry v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Luethe v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Curry v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- ROOD EX REL. RICHARDS v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.